XLE vs. LTPZ
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while LTPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LTPZ. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LTPZ.
Performance
XLE vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's 0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed LTPZ with an annualized return of 9.91%, while LTPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.75% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
LTPZ
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -0.67%
- 5Y*
- -5.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
XLE vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 0.53% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 24.89% | 17.47% | -7.22% | 9.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and LTPZ is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2009 | -0.15 |
The correlation between XLE and LTPZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
LTPZ
XLE vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.07 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 0.52 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 1.11 | +7.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than LTPZ's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and LTPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -40.99% | -30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -7.00% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -16.27% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -40.99% | +14.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -40.99% | -25.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -32.66% | +24.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -12.44% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 3.28% | +1.04% |
Volatility
XLE vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) at 2.55%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 2.55% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 6.54% | +10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 9.19% | +11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 15.87% | +10.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 15.07% | +14.51% |
XLE vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLE vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than LTPZ's 5.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 5.22% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and LTPZ have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to LTPZ (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs LTPZ's -40.99%.
On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.91% vs 0.75% for LTPZ. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, LTPZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 0.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LTPZ.
LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 2.59% for XLE.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while LTPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). They also come from different issuers: State Street and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.20% for LTPZ.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and LTPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer