XLE vs. EWZ
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while EWZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for EWZ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWZ.
Performance
XLE vs. EWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than EWZ's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed EWZ with an annualized return of 9.91%, while EWZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.29% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
EWZ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 31.47%
- 3Y*
- 9.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
XLE vs. EWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 10.48% | 48.81% | -30.41% | 32.62% | 12.09% | -17.32% | -20.35% | 27.67% | -2.52% | 23.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and EWZ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2000 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and EWZ has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLE vs. EWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
EWZ
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
EWZ
Basic Materials
XLE
-
EWZ
Communication Services
XLE
-
EWZ
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
EWZ
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
EWZ
Financial Services
XLE
-
EWZ
Healthcare
XLE
-
EWZ
Industrials
XLE
-
EWZ
Real Estate
XLE
-
EWZ
-
Technology
XLE
-
EWZ
Utilities
XLE
-
EWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. EWZ — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
EWZ
XLE vs. EWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.64 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 5.17 | +3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. EWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, smaller than the maximum EWZ drawdown of -77.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and EWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -77.25% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -19.27% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -31.36% | +11.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -32.24% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -56.99% | -9.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -23.06% | +15.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -35.93% | +17.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 6.10% | -1.78% |
Volatility
XLE vs. EWZ - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) have volatilities of 7.26% and 7.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 7.35% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 19.97% | -3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 25.20% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 27.70% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 34.04% | -4.46% |
XLE vs. EWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EWZ's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. EWZ - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than EWZ's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 4.70% | 5.19% | 8.91% | 5.66% | 12.59% | 9.87% | 1.71% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 1.71% | 1.81% | 4.08% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and EWZ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWZ has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs EWZ's -77.25%.
On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.91% vs 8.29% for EWZ. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZ.
EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 2.59% for XLE.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while EWZ is Latin America Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.59% for EWZ.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and EWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer