PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. ERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. ERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 66.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed ERX with an annualized return of 9.99%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively lower -9.37% annualized return.


XLE

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
32.26%
6M
29.34%
1Y
47.98%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
9.99%

ERX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-3.57%
YTD
66.84%
6M
58.30%
1Y
98.14%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
28.74%
10Y*
-9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.26%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
66.84%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and ERX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

0.99

The correlation between XLE and ERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLE vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
ERX

Energy

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XLE
100.0%
ERX
100.0%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

ERX

-

Communication Services

XLE

-

ERX

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

ERX

-

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

ERX

-

Financial Services

XLE

-

ERX

-

Healthcare

XLE

-

ERX

-

Industrials

XLE

-

ERX

-

Real Estate

XLE

-

ERX

-

Technology

XLE

-

ERX

-

Utilities

XLE

-

ERX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLEERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

4.23

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

11.45

+0.15

XLE vs. ERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and ERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLEERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.42

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.56

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

-0.14

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.09

+0.40

Drawdowns

XLE vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and ERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-99.54%

+28.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-23.34%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-42.34%

+22.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-46.90%

+20.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-98.59%

+31.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-91.58%

+85.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-67.03%

+49.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

8.60%

-4.45%

Volatility

XLE vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 8.25%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 16.49%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

16.49%

-8.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.51%

33.31%

-16.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.50%

41.08%

-20.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

51.98%

-25.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

69.16%

-39.58%

XLE vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLE vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than ERX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.61%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, XLE and ERX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ERX has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs ERX's -99.54%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.99% vs -9.37% for ERX. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.99% return vs -9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.61% for ERX.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while ERX is Leveraged Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 1.09% for ERX.

ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and ERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer