PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.95% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 13.83% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed DIA with an annualized return of 9.80%, while DIA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.51% annualized return.


XLE

1D
-2.07%
1M
7.87%
6M
9.98%
YTD
29.95%
1Y
38.22%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
22.66%
10Y*
9.80%
ALL TIME*
8.71%

DIA

1D
0.44%
1M
2.43%
6M
10.53%
YTD
13.83%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
13.51%
ALL TIME*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.47B$2.10B$2.43B
$1.81B$1.78B$1.93B

XLE vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.95%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
13.83%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and DIA is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.54

The correlation between XLE and DIA shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
DIA

Energy

100.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

3.9%

Communication Services

-

5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Financial Services

-

26.7%

Healthcare

-

13.2%

Industrials

-

18.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

16.1%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XLE
100.0%
DIA
1.9%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

DIA
3.9%

Communication Services

XLE

-

DIA
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

DIA
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

DIA
3.9%

Financial Services

XLE

-

DIA
26.7%

Healthcare

XLE

-

DIA
13.2%

Industrials

XLE

-

DIA
18.9%

Real Estate

XLE

-

DIA

-

Technology

XLE

-

DIA
16.1%

Utilities

XLE

-

DIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLE vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLEDIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.56

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

9.92

-3.12

XLE vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than DIA's maximum drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-51.87%

-19.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-9.76%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-15.95%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-20.76%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-36.70%

-30.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.73%

0.00%

-7.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

-7.10%

-10.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

2.52%

+3.12%

Volatility

XLE vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) at 4.16%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

4.16%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.48%

9.99%

+6.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.12%

12.53%

+8.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.76%

14.85%

+10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

17.54%

+12.04%

XLE vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLE vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than DIA's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.32%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.65%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and DIA have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to DIA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs DIA's -51.87%.

On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.51% vs 9.80% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIA has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for DIA.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.32% for DIA.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.16% for DIA.

DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer