XLE vs. AVGB
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while AVGB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Avantis. XLE is passively managed, while AVGB is actively managed. Over the past year, XLE returned 47.98% vs 4.50% for AVGB. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for AVGB.
Performance
XLE vs. AVGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly higher than AVGB's 0.84% return.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 32.26%
- 6M
- 29.34%
- 1Y
- 47.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 20.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
AVGB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE vs. AVGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.26% | 12.51% |
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 0.84% | 4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and AVGB is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. AVGB — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
AVGB
XLE vs. AVGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLE | AVGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.34 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 2.13 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 7.95 | +3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLE | AVGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.83 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 2.06 | -1.75 |
Drawdowns
XLE vs. AVGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than AVGB's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and AVGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | AVGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -2.12% | -69.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -2.12% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -0.37% | -5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -0.33% | -17.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 0.57% | +3.58% |
Volatility
XLE vs. AVGB - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) at 0.84%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | AVGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 0.84% | +7.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 1.91% | +14.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 2.48% | +18.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 2.48% | +23.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 2.48% | +27.10% |
XLE vs. AVGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGB's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLE vs. AVGB - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than AVGB's 3.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 3.46% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and AVGB have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to AVGB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs AVGB's -2.12%.
On 1-year performance, XLE leads with 47.98% vs 4.50% for AVGB. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XLE has performed better with a 47.98% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for AVGB.
AVGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while AVGB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.19% for AVGB.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and AVGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer