XLE vs. AIQ
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLE returned 20.12%/yr vs 16.96%/yr for AIQ. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
XLE vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than AIQ's 25.84% return.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
AIQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 25.84%
- 6M
- 26.79%
- 1Y
- 52.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.14%
- 5Y*
- 16.96%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -24.07% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 25.84% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and AIQ is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.28 |
The correlation between XLE and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLE vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
AIQ
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XLE
AIQ
-
Basic Materials
XLE
-
AIQ
-
Communication Services
XLE
-
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
AIQ
-
Financial Services
XLE
-
AIQ
Healthcare
XLE
-
AIQ
Industrials
XLE
-
AIQ
Real Estate
XLE
-
AIQ
-
Technology
XLE
-
AIQ
Utilities
XLE
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
AIQ
XLE vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 3.17 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 10.43 | -1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -44.66% | -26.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -16.47% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -26.35% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -44.66% | +18.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -8.75% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -9.79% | -8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 5.00% | -0.68% |
Volatility
XLE vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 7.26%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 12.90% | -5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 21.38% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 25.31% | -4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 25.74% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 25.71% | +3.87% |
XLE vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than AIQ's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and AIQ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.12% vs 16.96% for AIQ. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer