XLCS.L vs. SMH
XLCS.L (Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLCS.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Communications Services Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLCS.L returned 8.09%/yr vs 38.76%/yr for SMH. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLCS.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
XLCS.L vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLCS.L achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 74.25% return.
XLCS.L
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- -1.85%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 20.06%
- YTD
- 74.25%
- 6M
- 74.08%
- 1Y
- 150.04%
- 3Y*
- 63.96%
- 5Y*
- 38.76%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
XLCS.L vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLCS.L Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | -1.85% | 19.13% | 37.69% | 51.30% | -39.23% | 13.38% | 21.46% | 25.69% | -5.25% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 74.25% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLCS.L and SMH is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018 | 0.29 |
The correlation between XLCS.L and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLCS.L vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLCS.L
SMH
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
XLCS.L
SMH
-
Basic Materials
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Energy
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Industrials
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Technology
XLCS.L
-
SMH
Utilities
XLCS.L
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLCS.L vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
XLCS.L
SMH
XLCS.L vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLCS.L | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.69 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 10.11 | -9.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 38.76 | -37.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLCS.L | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 4.94 | -4.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 1.11 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.34 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
XLCS.L vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLCS.L drawdown since its inception was -47.62%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCS.L and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLCS.L | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.62% | -84.96% | +37.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -14.93% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -35.74% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.62% | -45.30% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -1.63% | -4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -41.08% | +30.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 3.89% | +0.06% |
Volatility
XLCS.L vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) is 4.12%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that XLCS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLCS.L | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 11.58% | -7.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 24.35% | -14.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 30.57% | -17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 35.01% | -15.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 32.57% | -11.95% |
XLCS.L vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLCS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLCS.L vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
XLCS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XLCS.L Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLCS.L and SMH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLCS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLCS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
XLCS.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. XLCS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Communications Services Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLCS.L and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for XLCS.L and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer