PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XLCP.L vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XLCP.L vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLCP.L (Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLCP.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLCP.L returned 9.26%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for VOO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLCP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A (XLCP.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLCP.L is traded in GBp, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCP.L achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.32% return.

XLCP.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
-2.31%
1Y
7.51%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
—

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.14%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.03%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLCP.L
Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A		-1.61%11.11%40.05%43.94%-32.63%15.05%17.17%27.75%-8.58%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		11.79%9.43%27.16%20.01%-8.44%30.01%14.85%26.37%-10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XLCP.L and VOO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018

0.49

The correlation between XLCP.L and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XLCP.L
VOO

Communication Services

100.0%
11.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Communication Services

XLCP.L
100.0%
VOO
11.3%

Basic Materials

XLCP.L

-

VOO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XLCP.L

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

XLCP.L

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

XLCP.L

-

VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

XLCP.L

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

XLCP.L

-

VOO
8.5%

Industrials

XLCP.L

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

XLCP.L

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

XLCP.L

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

XLCP.L

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with XLCP.L:
XLCP.L vs. XLCXLCP.L vs. QQQXLCP.L vs. IITU.LXLCP.L vs. XLREXLCP.L vs. VUAG.LXLCP.L vs. RUSG.LXLCP.L vs. SCHG
Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. IVV

Return for Risk

XLCP.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XLCP.L
XLCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XLCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A (XLCP.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XLCP.LVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.58
2.57

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.91
3.34

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.48

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

3.84

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

14.73

-12.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLCP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLCP.L and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XLCP.LVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

2.57

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.96

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.91

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.95

-0.32

Drawdowns

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCP.L and VOO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XLCP.LVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.47%

-26.09%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-7.66%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-21.93%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.47%

-21.93%

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-26.09%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

-0.44%

-4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-3.30%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.00%

+1.31%

Volatility

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A (XLCP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.68%. This indicates that XLCP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XLCP.LVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

2.68%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

8.17%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

11.46%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

15.77%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

18.10%

+0.49%

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLCP.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

XLCP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
XLCP.L
Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XLCP.L and VOO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLCP.L.

XLCP.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. XLCP.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLCP.L and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLCP.L and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer