PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A (XLCP.L) and SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLCP.L is traded in GBp, while GXLC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCP.L achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC.L's 2.07% return.


XLCP.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
-2.31%
1Y
7.51%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*

GXLC.L

1D
1.55%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
2.07%
6M
1.19%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLCP.L
Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A
-1.61%11.11%40.05%43.94%-32.63%15.05%17.17%27.75%-8.58%
GXLC.L
SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF
2.07%19.01%33.60%45.06%-29.78%18.90%22.83%25.39%-10.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XLCP.L and GXLC.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018

0.97

The correlation between XLCP.L and GXLC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLCP.L
GXLC.L

Communication Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

XLCP.L
100.0%
GXLC.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Energy

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Financial Services

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Healthcare

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Industrials

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Real Estate

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Technology

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Utilities

XLCP.L

-

GXLC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLCP.L
XLCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XLCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLC.L
GXLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GXLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A (XLCP.L) and SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLCP.LGXLC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.28

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.55

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

9.15

-6.89

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLCP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the GXLC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLCP.L and GXLC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLCP.LGXLC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.65

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.64

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.69

-0.06

Drawdowns

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, which is greater than GXLC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCP.L and GXLC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCP.LGXLC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.47%

-35.84%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-8.66%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-18.45%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.47%

-35.84%

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

-4.54%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-7.72%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.41%

+0.90%

Volatility

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A (XLCP.L) and SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCP.LGXLC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

4.36%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

9.64%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

13.32%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

17.92%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

19.04%

-0.45%

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GXLC.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLCP.L vs. GXLC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLCP.L nor GXLC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XLCP.L and GXLC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLCP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLCP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXLC.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLCP.L and 0.15% for GXLC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLCP.L and GXLC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer