PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLCI vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLCI vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -4.59% return.


XLCI

1D
-0.06%
1M
-2.40%
6M
-2.03%
YTD
-2.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLD

1D
2.03%
1M
-8.21%
6M
-4.59%
YTD
-4.59%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
28.44%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLCI vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLCI and GLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLCI vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLCI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLCI vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLCIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

XLCI vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLCI vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-45.56%

+37.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-23.75%

+18.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-16.18%

+14.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.02%

Volatility

XLCI vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

27.74%

-16.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.48%

18.33%

-6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.48%

16.08%

-4.60%

XLCI vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLCI vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLCI and GLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLCI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLCI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

XLCI has the higher dividend yield at 11.66%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

XLCI is categorized as Derivative Income, while GLD is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLCI and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer