PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLCI vs. FYEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLCI vs. FYEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly lower than FYEE's 9.14% return.


XLCI

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.56%
6M
-4.49%
YTD
-2.58%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.98%

FYEE

1D
0.78%
1M
2.77%
6M
7.38%
YTD
9.14%
1Y
22.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.70M$1.94M$2.28M
$102.51K$79.36K$72.31K

XLCI vs. FYEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLCI and FYEE is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.61

The correlation between XLCI and FYEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLCI vs. FYEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLCI
XLCI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLCI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XLCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FYEE
FYEE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FYEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYEE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FYEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYEE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLCI vs. FYEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLCIFYEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.39

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.87

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

13.74

-12.50

XLCI vs. FYEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the FYEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLCI and FYEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLCI vs. FYEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum FYEE drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and FYEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCIFYEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-18.79%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-7.39%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

0.00%

-5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-2.17%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

1.55%

+1.31%

Volatility

XLCI vs. FYEE - Volatility Comparison

State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) at 3.27%. This indicates that XLCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCIFYEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

3.27%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

8.38%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

10.70%

+1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

13.78%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

13.78%

-1.49%

XLCI vs. FYEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FYEE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLCI vs. FYEE - Dividend Comparison

XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than FYEE's 8.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLCI and FYEE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLCI has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to FYEE (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLCI dropped -8.44% vs FYEE's -18.79%.

On 1-year performance, FYEE leads with 22.82% vs 4.28% for XLCI. On fees, FYEE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FYEE has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FYEE has performed better with a 22.82% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FYEE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLCI.

XLCI has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 8.33% for FYEE.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.28% for FYEE.

FYEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLCI and FYEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer