XLCI vs. DBO
XLCI (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLCI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. XLCI is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. XLCI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
XLCI vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 41.64% return.
XLCI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -21.60%
- 6M
- 41.64%
- YTD
- 41.64%
- 1Y
- 31.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
XLCI vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -2.03% | 6.73% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 41.64% | -12.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLCI and DBO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLCI vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
XLCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBO
XLCI vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLCI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLCI vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLCI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -90.18% | +81.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -62.73% | +57.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -62.22% | +60.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.53% | — |
Volatility
XLCI vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLCI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 34.67% | -23.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 32.66% | -21.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 31.84% | -20.36% |
XLCI vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLCI vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, more than DBO's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.48% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.66% | 5.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLCI and DBO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLCI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLCI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
XLCI has the higher dividend yield at 11.66%, compared with 2.48% for DBO.
XLCI is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for XLCI and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer