XLCI vs. ARMW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XLCI (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XLCI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

XLCI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 134.95% return.

XLCI

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: -4.49%
• YTD: -2.58%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.98%

ARMW

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -28.55%
• 6M: 146.99%
• YTD: 134.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	$3.87M	$4.86M	$4.12M
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$102.51K	$79.36K	$72.31K

XLCI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	-2.58%	2.45%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	134.95%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between XLCI and ARMW is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.16

XLCI vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLCI	ARMW
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Financial Services	99.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	18.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLCI vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLCI

XLCI Risk / Return Rank: 18
XLCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XLCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
XLCI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XLCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
XLCI Martin Ratio Rank: 20

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLCI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLCI	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	—	—

Drawdowns

XLCI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLCI	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-56.50%	+48.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.54%	-52.71%	+47.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-27.18%	+25.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLCI	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	96.03%	-83.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.29%	96.03%	-83.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.29%	96.03%	-83.74%

XLCI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLCI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, less than ARMW's 62.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	62.70%	16.38%
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.73%	5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLCI and ARMW in my portfolio?

XLCI and ARMW have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLCI or ARMW?

On fees, XLCI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLCI or ARMW?

XLCI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLCI or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 62.70%, compared with 11.73% for XLCI.

What is the main difference between XLCI and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.99% for ARMW.