BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L).
BRIP.L and XLIS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BRIP.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Mirae Asset European Infrastructure Development Index. It was launched on Sep 3, 2024. XLIS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both BRIP.L and XLIS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BRIP.L Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating | 5.03% | 33.47% | -3.56% |
XLIS.L Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 4.08% | 10.85% | 10.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
BRIP.L is traded in GBP, while XLIS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLIS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRIP.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly higher than XLIS.L's 4.08% return.
BRIP.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 22.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLIS.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRIP.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
BRIP.L
XLIS.L
BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRIP.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 1.22 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.71 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.71 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 6.10 | +0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRIP.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.22 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.71 | +0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between BRIP.L and XLIS.L is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BRIP.L nor XLIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRIP.L drawdown since its inception was -10.38%, smaller than the maximum XLIS.L drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRIP.L and XLIS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRIP.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -42.30% | +31.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -13.31% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -10.10% | +2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -4.70% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.99% | +0.17% |
Volatility
BRIP.L vs. XLIS.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) at 5.33%. This indicates that BRIP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BRIP.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 5.33% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | 9.88% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.53% | 17.23% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 16.79% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 18.96% | -4.29% |