XLBI vs. SETM
XLBI (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and SETM (Sprott Critical Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLBI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while SETM is a Materials fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. XLBI is actively managed, while SETM is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLBI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SETM.
Performance
XLBI vs. SETM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBI achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than SETM's -2.07% return.
XLBI
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETM
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -18.25%
- 6M
- -19.06%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 46.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLBI vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 7.51% | 2.25% |
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF | -2.07% | 51.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBI and SETM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.56 |
XLBI vs. SETM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLBI
SETM
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLBI
SETM
-
Basic Materials
XLBI
-
SETM
Communication Services
XLBI
-
SETM
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLBI
-
SETM
-
Consumer Defensive
XLBI
-
SETM
Energy
XLBI
-
SETM
Healthcare
XLBI
-
SETM
-
Industrials
XLBI
-
SETM
Real Estate
XLBI
-
SETM
-
Technology
XLBI
-
SETM
Utilities
XLBI
-
SETM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLBI vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank
XLBI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SETM
XLBI vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLBI | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLBI vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBI drawdown since its inception was -10.62%, smaller than the maximum SETM drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBI and SETM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBI | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -42.81% | +32.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -28.64% | +26.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -15.20% | +13.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.94% | — |
Volatility
XLBI vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLBI | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 46.71% | -32.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 37.20% | -23.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 37.20% | -23.34% |
XLBI vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLBI vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison
XLBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, more than SETM's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF | 1.60% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.88% | 7.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLBI and SETM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.
XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.88%, compared with 1.60% for SETM.
XLBI is categorized as Derivative Income, while SETM is Materials. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLBI and 0.65% for SETM.
Find the right allocation for XLBI and SETM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer