XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO
XLB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF) and CLG.TO (iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds from iShares - XLB.TO tracks the Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD while CLG.TO tracks the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLB.TO returned 4.56%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CLG.TO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLB.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for CLG.TO.
Performance
XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLB.TO achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than CLG.TO's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, XLB.TO has outperformed CLG.TO with an annualized return of 4.56%, while CLG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.
XLB.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
CLG.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLB.TO iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF | 2.77% | -0.76% | 9.49% | 19.21% | -14.38% | 1.26% | 16.52% | 12.85% | -0.25% | 7.11% |
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 1.12% | 3.35% | 4.30% | 4.82% | -6.21% | -2.23% | 6.66% | 3.40% | 1.69% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLB.TO and CLG.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2011 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XLB.TO and CLG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XLB.TO
CLG.TO
XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) and iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLB.TO | CLG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 1.49 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 3.71 | -2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLB.TO | CLG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 0.96 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.31 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.35 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, which is greater than CLG.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB.TO and CLG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLB.TO | CLG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -10.74% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | -1.93% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.74% | -3.38% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.34% | -9.96% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.34% | -10.74% | -13.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -0.56% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -2.00% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 0.77% | +1.80% |
Volatility
XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) at 1.13%. This indicates that XLB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLB.TO | CLG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 1.13% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 2.34% | +3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.93% | 3.00% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 4.31% | +8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 4.34% | +7.52% |
XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLB.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CLG.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLB.TO vs. CLG.TO - Dividend Comparison
XLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than CLG.TO's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.54% | 2.53% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.61% | 2.59% | 2.88% | 3.02% | 3.17% | 3.25% | 3.34% |
XLB.TO iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF | 4.01% | 4.05% | 12.10% | 12.22% | 13.13% | 8.82% | 7.43% | 3.18% | 3.56% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLB.TO and CLG.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLG.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLG.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLB.TO.
XLB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD, while CLG.TO tracks Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLB.TO and 0.17% for CLG.TO.
Find the right allocation for XLB.TO and CLG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer