XJUN vs. UXJL
XJUN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. XJUN is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
XJUN vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJUN achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 12.29% return.
XJUN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 10.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XJUN vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XJUN FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June | 3.11% | 4.07% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 12.29% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJUN and UXJL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJUN vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
XJUN
UXJL
XJUN vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJUN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJUN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 1.91 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
XJUN vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJUN drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUN and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJUN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -10.29% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.31% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -1.51% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | — | — |
Volatility
XJUN vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJUN | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 13.88% | -10.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 13.88% | -6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 13.88% | -6.70% |
XJUN vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XJUN and UXJL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
XJUN vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither XJUN nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XJUN and UXJL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XJUN and UXJL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
XJUN and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and First Trust.
Find the right allocation for XJUN and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer