XJUN vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

XJUN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. XJUN is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, XJUN returned 9.68% vs 2.89% for BAMU. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

XJUN vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJUN achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.16% return.

XJUN

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 3.30%
• 6M: 3.51%
• 1Y: 9.68%
• 3Y*: 10.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJUN vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XJUN FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June	3.30%	11.18%	9.96%	6.17%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.16%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XJUN and BAMU is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.01

The correlation between XJUN and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XJUN vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJUN

XJUN Risk / Return Rank: 93
XJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
XJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 95
XJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
XJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJUN vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XJUN	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	5.01	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.77	8.84	-4.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	2.43	-0.72
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	24.72	-19.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.70	97.89	-68.19

XJUN vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJUN Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJUN and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XJUN vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJUN drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUN and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XJUN	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.14%	-0.36%	-8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.97%	-0.12%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-0.02%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	0.03%	+0.31%

Volatility

XJUN vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) has a higher volatility of 0.23% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that XJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XJUN	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.23%	0.09%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.45%	0.40%	+2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.32%	0.58%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.15%	0.87%	+6.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.15%	0.87%	+6.28%

XJUN vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

XJUN vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

XJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
XJUN FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XJUN and BAMU in my portfolio?

XJUN and BAMU have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XJUN or BAMU?

XJUN has higher volatility (0.23%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJUN dropped -9.14% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, XJUN or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, XJUN leads with 9.68% vs 2.89% for BAMU. On fees, XJUN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XJUN or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, XJUN has performed better with a 9.68% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XJUN or BAMU?

XJUN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XJUN or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for XJUN.

What is the main difference between XJUN and BAMU?

XJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XJUN and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.