PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJUN vs. FAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XJUN vs. FAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XJUN vs. FAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XJUN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June
0.33%11.18%9.96%14.63%0.05%3.36%
FAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
1.26%7.58%18.14%19.50%-10.33%5.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJUN achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than FAPR's 1.26% return.


XJUN

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
0.33%
6M
2.02%
1Y
11.86%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
10Y*

FAPR

1D
0.17%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.33%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XJUN vs. FAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XJUN and FAPR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

XJUN vs. FAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJUN
XJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FAPR
FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJUN vs. FAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XJUNFAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

0.82

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

1.22

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.03

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.80

5.74

+5.06

XJUN vs. FAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the FAPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJUN and FAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XJUNFAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

0.82

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.81

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between XJUN and FAPR is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XJUN vs. FAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XJUN nor FAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XJUN vs. FAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJUN drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, smaller than the maximum FAPR drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUN and FAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XJUNFAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-15.96%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-9.75%

+2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

0.00%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-2.80%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.74%

-0.63%

Volatility

XJUN vs. FAPR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) at 1.77%. This indicates that XJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XJUNFAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.77%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

2.63%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.30%

11.61%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.30%

10.58%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.30%

10.58%

-3.28%