XJUN vs. APRB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XJUN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. XJUN is passively managed, while APRB is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.

Performance

XJUN vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJUN achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than APRB's 4.94% return.

XJUN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 3.77%
• 1Y: 10.38%
• 3Y*: 10.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRB

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 6M: 5.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJUN vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XJUN FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June	3.11%	1.94%
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF	4.94%	2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XJUN and APRB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

XJUN vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJUN

XJUN Risk / Return Rank: 93
XJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 95
XJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
XJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJUN vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XJUN	APRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.91	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XJUN	APRB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	2.04	-0.85

Drawdowns

XJUN vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJUN drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUN and APRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	XJUN	APRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.14%	-4.59%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	0.00%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-0.74%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XJUN	APRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36%	5.96%	-2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.18%	5.96%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.18%	5.96%	+1.22%

XJUN vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XJUN vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

Neither XJUN nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XJUN and APRB in my portfolio?

XJUN and APRB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XJUN or APRB?

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XJUN or APRB?

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XJUN or APRB?

XJUN and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XJUN and APRB?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XJUN and 0.25% for APRB.