PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJUL vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJUL vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJUL achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 8.45% return.


XJUL

1D
0.34%
1M
0.72%
6M
4.40%
YTD
4.97%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.93%

XLRI

1D
0.16%
1M
1.35%
6M
6.08%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$231.21K$142.92K$603.44K
$84.19K$69.65K$65.16K

XJUL vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XJUL and XLRI is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJUL vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XJUL
XJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI
XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XJUL vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJULXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.18

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.48

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.85

5.18

+13.68

XJUL vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJUL and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJUL vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJUL drawdown since its inception was -9.10%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUL and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJULXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-7.12%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-7.12%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.62%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-1.54%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

2.03%

-1.52%

Volatility

XJUL vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) is 1.25%, while State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that XJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJULXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

3.42%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

8.72%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

11.09%

-6.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.84%

11.11%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.84%

11.11%

-4.27%

XJUL vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XJUL vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

XJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XJUL and XLRI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLRI has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to XJUL (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJUL dropped -9.10% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, XLRI leads with 10.59% vs 10.17% for XJUL. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XJUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLRI has performed better with a 10.59% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XJUL.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.52%, compared with 0.00% for XJUL.

XJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XJUL and 0.35% for XLRI.

XJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJUL and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer