XJUL vs. IWMY
XJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XJUL returned 10.17% vs 19.50% for IWMY. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for IWMY.
Performance
XJUL vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJUL achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 13.35% return.
XJUL
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.93%
IWMY
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $636.13K | $744.03K | $1.04M | |
| $231.21K | $142.92K | $603.44K |
XJUL vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July | 4.97% | 10.19% | 10.58% | 7.81% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF | 13.35% | 10.18% | 5.56% | 10.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJUL and IWMY is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XJUL and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJUL vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank
XJUL
IWMY
XJUL vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XJUL | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.20 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 1.58 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.85 | 5.12 | +13.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XJUL vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJUL drawdown since its inception was -9.10%, smaller than the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUL and IWMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJUL | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -18.72% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -11.57% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.64% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -2.88% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 3.56% | -3.05% |
Volatility
XJUL vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) is 1.25%, while Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that XJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJUL | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 3.40% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 13.46% | -10.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.29% | 16.30% | -12.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 15.78% | -8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 15.78% | -8.94% |
XJUL vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
XJUL vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison
XJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF | 41.85% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
XJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XJUL and IWMY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWMY has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to XJUL (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJUL dropped -9.10% vs IWMY's -18.72%.
On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 19.50% vs 10.17% for XJUL. On fees, XJUL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XJUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJUL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for IWMY.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 41.85%, compared with 0.00% for XJUL.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XJUL and 1.05% for IWMY.
XJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJUL and IWMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer