PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJUL vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJUL vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJUL achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 9.86% return.


XJUL

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.57%
YTD
3.59%
6M
4.21%
1Y
10.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWMY

1D
-3.49%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
9.86%
6M
8.21%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJUL vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XJUL and IWMY is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.69

The correlation between XJUL and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJUL vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJUL
XJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJUL vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XJULIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.22

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

1.76

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.03

5.77

+15.26

XJUL vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJUL and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XJULIWMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.26

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.88

+0.55

Drawdowns

XJUL vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJUL drawdown since its inception was -9.10%, smaller than the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJUL and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJULIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-18.72%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-11.57%

+8.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-3.49%

+3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-2.98%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

3.52%

-3.01%

Volatility

XJUL vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July (XJUL) is 0.36%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that XJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJULIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

6.38%

-6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

13.20%

-10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

16.15%

-11.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

15.91%

-8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

15.91%

-8.92%

XJUL vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XJUL vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

XJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.58%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
46.58%63.33%107.92%11.34%
XJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJUL and IWMY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to XJUL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJUL dropped -9.10% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 20.28% vs 10.65% for XJUL. On fees, XJUL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 20.28% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJUL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 46.58%, compared with 0.00% for XJUL.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XJUL and 0.99% for IWMY.

XJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJUL and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer