XJR vs. SOXX
XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJR returned 5.38%/yr vs 34.50%/yr for SOXX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XJR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
XJR vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return.
XJR
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 33.25%
- YTD
- 104.57%
- 6M
- 99.43%
- 1Y
- 190.05%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 35.79%
XJR vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 14.91% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 104.57% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 30.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and SOXX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XJR and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
XJR vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XJR
SOXX
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XJR
SOXX
-
Technology
XJR
SOXX
Industrials
XJR
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
XJR
SOXX
-
Healthcare
XJR
SOXX
-
Real Estate
XJR
SOXX
-
Energy
XJR
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
XJR
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
XJR
SOXX
-
Communication Services
XJR
SOXX
-
Utilities
XJR
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJR vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
XJR
SOXX
XJR vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJR | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 5.61 | -4.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 5.36 | -3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.74 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 12.13 | -9.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 46.43 | -36.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJR | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 5.61 | -4.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.96 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.45 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJR | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -70.21% | +43.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -15.77% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -41.36% | +14.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -45.75% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | 0.00% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -19.97% | +10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 4.11% | -1.18% |
Volatility
XJR vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) is 4.77%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that XJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJR | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 14.03% | -9.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 27.35% | -15.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 34.18% | -16.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 36.11% | -14.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 33.43% | -11.70% |
XJR vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
XJR vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XJR and SOXX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to XJR (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 5-year performance, SOXX leads with 34.50% vs 5.38% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 34.50% return vs 5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SOXX.
XJR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJR and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer