XJAN vs. XMAR

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XJAN (FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January) and XMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds from FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XJAN returned 9.50% vs 11.28% for XMAR. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

XJAN vs. XMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January (XJAN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJAN achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than XMAR's 7.15% return.

XJAN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 4.24%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 1Y: 9.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMAR

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 1Y: 11.28%
• 3Y*: 10.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJAN vs. XMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XJAN FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January	4.47%	9.14%	9.08%
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March	7.15%	10.30%	9.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XJAN and XMAR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2024	0.78

The correlation between XJAN and XMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XJAN vs. XMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJAN

XJAN Risk / Return Rank: 81
XJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 90
XJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 86

XMAR

XMAR Risk / Return Rank: 98
XMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
XMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJAN vs. XMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January (XJAN) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XJAN	XMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	3.72	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	6.25	-3.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.97	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	7.66	-5.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.29	51.73	-38.43

XJAN vs. XMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the XMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJAN and XMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XJAN vs. XMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJAN drawdown since its inception was -10.04%, which is greater than XMAR's maximum drawdown of -7.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJAN and XMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XJAN	XMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.04%	-7.29%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-1.48%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.27%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.57%	-0.30%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.22%	+0.50%

Volatility

XJAN vs. XMAR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January (XJAN) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) at 0.85%. This indicates that XJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XJAN	XMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.97%	0.85%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.34%	2.67%	+1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.75%	3.05%	+1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.10%	5.49%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.10%	5.49%	+1.61%

XJAN vs. XMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XJAN and XMAR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

XJAN vs. XMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XJAN nor XMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XJAN and XMAR in my portfolio?

XJAN and XMAR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XJAN or XMAR?

XJAN has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to XMAR (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJAN dropped -10.04% vs XMAR's -7.29%.

Which ETF is better, XJAN or XMAR?

On 1-year performance, XMAR leads with 11.28% vs 9.50% for XJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, XMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XJAN or XMAR?

Over the 1-year period, XMAR has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XJAN or XMAR?

XJAN and XMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XJAN or XMAR?

XJAN and XMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.