PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and CIF.TO (iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while CIF.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Manulife Investment Management Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO returned 13.04%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for CIF.TO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIU.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for CIF.TO.

Performance

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than CIF.TO's 25.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XIU.TO having a 13.04% annualized return and CIF.TO not far ahead at 13.54%.

XIU.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
3.42%
YTD
11.35%
6M
12.04%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
14.53%
10Y*
13.04%

CIF.TO

1D
1.09%
1M
1.01%
YTD
25.11%
6M
18.12%
1Y
34.53%
3Y*
24.98%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		11.35%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%
CIF.TO
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF		25.11%14.57%25.83%14.99%6.22%18.14%-0.31%24.93%-5.12%2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XIU.TO and CIF.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2008

0.53

The correlation between XIU.TO and CIF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XIU.TO
CIF.TO

Financial Services

39.4%

-

Energy

18.6%
20.8%

Basic Materials

13.3%

-

Technology

8.8%
0.5%

Industrials

7.9%
31.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.6%
46.9%

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

XIU.TO
39.4%
CIF.TO

-

Energy

XIU.TO
18.6%
CIF.TO
20.8%

Basic Materials

XIU.TO
13.3%
CIF.TO

-

Technology

XIU.TO
8.8%
CIF.TO
0.5%

Industrials

XIU.TO
7.9%
CIF.TO
31.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XIU.TO
4.1%
CIF.TO
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

XIU.TO
3.2%
CIF.TO

-

Utilities

XIU.TO
2.6%
CIF.TO
46.9%

Communication Services

XIU.TO
2.0%
CIF.TO

-

Real Estate

XIU.TO
0.2%
CIF.TO

-

Healthcare

XIU.TO

-

CIF.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF

Often compared with XIU.TO:
XIU.TO vs. XIC.TOXIU.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXIU.TO vs. XSP.TOXIU.TO vs. HXT.TOXIU.TO vs. SPYXIU.TO vs. XIT.TO
Often compared with CIF.TO:
CIF.TO vs. VFV.TOCIF.TO vs. MLPP.LCIF.TO vs. ZQQ.TOCIF.TO vs. CWW.TOCIF.TO vs. VGTCIF.TO vs. ZGI.TOCIF.TO vs. XDIV.TO

Return for Risk

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
CIF.TO
CIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XIU.TOCIF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.71
2.23

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.61
3.00

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.41

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

3.64

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.57

12.99

+6.58

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the CIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIU.TO and CIF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.98%, roughly equal to the maximum CIF.TO drawdown of -45.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and CIF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XIU.TOCIF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.98%

-45.41%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-9.49%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-20.33%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-20.33%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

-45.41%

+9.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.94%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-9.75%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.65%

-0.99%

Volatility

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) is 4.06%, while iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF.TO) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that XIU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XIU.TOCIF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

5.07%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

12.85%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

15.50%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

15.16%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

25.97%

-10.95%

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CIF.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIU.TO vs. CIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than CIF.TO's 1.82% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIF.TO
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF		1.82%2.14%3.13%2.63%2.83%2.55%2.37%2.11%2.82%2.64%2.09%2.81%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.18%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

XIU.TO and CIF.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIU.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for CIF.TO.

XIU.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CIF.TO is Energy Equities. XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while CIF.TO tracks Manulife Investment Management Global Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XIU.TO and 0.72% for CIF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIU.TO and CIF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer