PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIMR vs. CERY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIMR vs. CERY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIMR achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than CERY's 19.54% return.


XIMR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
4.31%
6M
4.51%
1Y
8.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CERY

1D
-0.67%
1M
-8.39%
YTD
19.54%
6M
18.91%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIMR vs. CERY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XIMR and CERY is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIMR vs. CERY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIMR
XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CERY
CERY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIMR vs. CERY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIMRCERYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.33

1.29

+1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.87

2.31

+5.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

64.30

9.93

+54.38

XIMR vs. CERY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIMR Sharpe Ratio is 4.12, which is higher than the CERY Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIMR and CERY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIMR vs. CERY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIMR drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, smaller than the maximum CERY drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIMR and CERY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIMRCERYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-11.37%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-11.37%

+10.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-11.37%

+11.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-2.27%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

2.83%

-2.70%

Volatility

XIMR vs. CERY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) is 0.77%, while SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that XIMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CERY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIMRCERYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

3.57%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

13.57%

-11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

15.63%

-13.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.34%

14.73%

-10.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.34%

14.73%

-10.39%

XIMR vs. CERY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIMR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CERY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIMR vs. CERY - Dividend Comparison

XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than CERY's 4.18% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XIMR and CERY have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CERY has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to XIMR (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIMR dropped -5.12% vs CERY's -11.37%.

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 26.17% vs 8.49% for XIMR. On fees, CERY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, XIMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 26.17% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CERY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XIMR.

XIMR has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 4.18% for CERY.

XIMR is categorized as Options Trading, while CERY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIMR and 0.28% for CERY.

XIMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIMR and CERY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer