XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO
XIGS.TO (iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and FLCI.TO (Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. XIGS.TO is passively managed, while FLCI.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XIGS.TO returned 4.15%/yr vs 7.24%/yr for FLCI.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIGS.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FLCI.TO.
Performance
XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIGS.TO achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than FLCI.TO's 2.34% return.
XIGS.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 2.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCI.TO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -0.04% | 4.82% | 3.76% | 5.39% | -5.89% | -0.97% |
FLCI.TO Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF | 2.34% | 4.88% | 8.03% | 8.31% | -10.13% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIGS.TO and FLCI.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIGS.TO
FLCI.TO
XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) and Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF (FLCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIGS.TO | FLCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 2.36 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 6.55 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIGS.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, smaller than the maximum FLCI.TO drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIGS.TO and FLCI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIGS.TO | FLCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -17.51% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -2.27% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.60% | -3.31% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | 0.00% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -3.29% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.82% | -0.26% |
Volatility
XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) is 0.60%, while Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF (FLCI.TO) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that XIGS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIGS.TO | FLCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 1.23% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 3.00% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25% | 3.96% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 5.64% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 6.47% | -3.17% |
XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIGS.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCI.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIGS.TO vs. FLCI.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIGS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than FLCI.TO's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCI.TO Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF | 4.40% | 4.26% | 4.41% | 4.09% | 4.95% | 3.35% | 3.25% | 3.68% | 3.87% | 0.84% |
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.46% | 4.10% | 3.71% | 3.03% | 1.75% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIGS.TO and FLCI.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIGS.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIGS.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FLCI.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XIGS.TO and 0.39% for FLCI.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIGS.TO and FLCI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer