PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIGS.TO vs. ISTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XIGS.TO is traded in CAD, while ISTB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISTB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIGS.TO achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than ISTB's 4.46% return.


XIGS.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.05%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
10Y*

ISTB

1D
0.51%
1M
3.58%
YTD
4.46%
6M
4.64%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
7.82%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
3.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XIGS.TO
iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-0.04%4.82%3.76%5.39%-5.89%-0.97%
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.46%1.51%13.21%3.04%-0.13%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XIGS.TO and ISTB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021

0.20

The correlation between XIGS.TO and ISTB shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIGS.TO
XIGS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XIGS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIGS.TOISTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.91

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

4.57

-1.01

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIGS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the ISTB Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIGS.TO and ISTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIGS.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, smaller than the maximum ISTB drawdown of -14.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIGS.TO and ISTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIGS.TOISTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-14.51%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-3.82%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.60%

-5.59%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-4.67%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.59%

-1.03%

Volatility

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) is 0.60%, while iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that XIGS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIGS.TOISTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

1.28%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

3.45%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

4.84%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

6.85%

-3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

7.03%

-3.73%

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIGS.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XIGS.TO vs. ISTB - Dividend Comparison

XIGS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than ISTB's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.24%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%
XIGS.TO
iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
4.46%4.10%3.71%3.03%1.75%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIGS.TO and ISTB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XIGS.TO.

XIGS.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ISTB is Short-Term Bond. XIGS.TO tracks ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index (CAD-Hedged), while ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XIGS.TO and 0.06% for ISTB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIGS.TO and ISTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer