PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF (FLCI.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCI.TO achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than FCSB.NEO's 1.52% return.


FLCI.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
1.92%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.41%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*

FCSB.NEO

1D
0.39%
1M
1.24%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.43%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLCI.TO
Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF
2.06%4.88%8.03%8.31%-10.13%-1.36%8.04%0.62%
FCSB.NEO
Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.52%4.15%7.55%6.81%-4.22%-0.81%6.26%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCI.TO and FCSB.NEO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.25

The correlation between FLCI.TO and FCSB.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCI.TO
FLCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FLCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FCSB.NEO
FCSB.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FCSB.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSB.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSB.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSB.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSB.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF (FLCI.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCI.TOFCSB.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.60

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.43

9.57

-2.14

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FCSB.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCI.TO and FCSB.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.51%, which is greater than FCSB.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCI.TO and FCSB.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCI.TOFCSB.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.51%

-12.48%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-1.58%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-1.58%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.63%

-7.44%

-7.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-1.50%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.43%

+0.38%

Volatility

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF (FLCI.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) at 0.95%. This indicates that FLCI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSB.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCI.TOFCSB.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.95%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.95%

2.07%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

2.70%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

3.31%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

4.95%

+1.52%

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCI.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSB.NEO's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCI.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FLCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than FCSB.NEO's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSB.NEO
Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
3.78%3.73%3.59%3.06%2.09%1.58%2.34%0.38%0.00%0.00%
FLCI.TO
Franklin Canadian Corporate Bond Fund ETF
4.41%4.26%4.41%4.09%4.95%3.35%3.25%3.68%3.87%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCI.TO and FCSB.NEO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLCI.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for FCSB.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLCI.TO and 0.44% for FCSB.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCI.TO and FCSB.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer