XIDV vs. GMOI

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - XIDV tracks the VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index while GMOI tracks the MSCI World ex USA Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XIDV returned 27.41% vs 34.93% for GMOI. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XIDV charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.

Performance

XIDV vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 11.76% return.

XIDV

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: 10.22%
• 6M: 13.84%
• 1Y: 27.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMOI

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 11.76%
• 6M: 15.15%
• 1Y: 34.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIDV vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF	10.22%	40.30%
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	11.76%	40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XIDV and GMOI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	0.90

The correlation between XIDV and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XIDV vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIDV

XIDV Risk / Return Rank: 72
XIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
XIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
XIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
XIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

GMOI

GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 83
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIDV vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XIDV	GMOI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.64	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.61	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.46	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	4.20	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	16.57	-4.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIDV vs. GMOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the GMOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIDV and GMOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XIDV	GMOI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.64	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.55	2.05	+0.51

Drawdowns

XIDV vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum GMOI drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and GMOI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIDV	GMOI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-14.67%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.25%	-8.36%	+0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.78%	-2.11%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.42%	-1.70%	+0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	2.11%	+0.17%

Volatility

XIDV vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) is 3.64%, while GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that XIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XIDV	GMOI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.64%	3.90%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.00%	10.49%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	13.31%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.80%	15.64%	-0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.80%	15.64%	-0.84%

XIDV vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIDV vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison

XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than GMOI's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	2.45%	2.74%	0.54%
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF	4.32%	4.63%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XIDV and GMOI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, XIDV and GMOI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XIDV or GMOI?

GMOI has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to XIDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs GMOI's -14.67%.

Which ETF is better, XIDV or GMOI?

On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 34.93% vs 27.41% for XIDV. On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XIDV or GMOI?

Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 34.93% return vs 27.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XIDV or GMOI?

XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XIDV or GMOI?

XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 2.45% for GMOI.

What is the main difference between XIDV and GMOI?

XIDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while GMOI tracks MSCI World ex USA Value. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XIDV and 0.60% for GMOI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.