XIDV vs. FPXI
XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) and FPXI (First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - XIDV tracks the VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index while FPXI tracks the IPOX International Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XIDV returned 27.41% vs 36.96% for FPXI. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIDV charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FPXI.
Performance
XIDV vs. FPXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIDV achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than FPXI's 25.19% return.
XIDV
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPXI
- 1D
- -5.68%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 25.19%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
XIDV vs. FPXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 10.22% | 40.30% |
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 25.19% | 17.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIDV and FPXI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between XIDV and FPXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
XIDV vs. FPXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIDV
FPXI
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
XIDV
FPXI
Energy
XIDV
FPXI
Consumer Cyclical
XIDV
FPXI
Consumer Defensive
XIDV
FPXI
Industrials
XIDV
FPXI
Basic Materials
XIDV
FPXI
Utilities
XIDV
FPXI
Communication Services
XIDV
FPXI
Healthcare
XIDV
FPXI
Real Estate
XIDV
FPXI
Technology
XIDV
FPXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIDV vs. FPXI — Risk / Return Rank
XIDV
FPXI
XIDV vs. FPXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIDV | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.27 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.51 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 8.63 | +3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIDV | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.54 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 0.45 | +2.11 |
Drawdowns
XIDV vs. FPXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIDV drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum FPXI drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDV and FPXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIDV | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -55.78% | +43.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -14.77% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -7.20% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -20.25% | +18.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 4.29% | -2.01% |
Volatility
XIDV vs. FPXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) is 3.64%, while First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that XIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIDV | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 10.25% | -6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 20.70% | -10.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 24.14% | -11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 21.71% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 21.26% | -6.46% |
XIDV vs. FPXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIDV has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FPXI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIDV vs. FPXI - Dividend Comparison
XIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than FPXI's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.64% | 0.70% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 1.13% | 0.71% | 0.18% | 0.67% | 1.75% | 0.75% | 2.09% | 1.34% |
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF | 4.32% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIDV and FPXI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPXI has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to XIDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDV dropped -12.15% vs FPXI's -55.78%.
On 1-year performance, FPXI leads with 36.96% vs 27.41% for XIDV. On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FPXI has performed better with a 36.96% return vs 27.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.
XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 0.64% for FPXI.
XIDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier International Dividend Select Index, while FPXI tracks IPOX International Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XIDV and 0.70% for FPXI.
XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIDV and FPXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer