PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIDE vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIDE vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIDE achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 12.11% return.


XIDE

1D
0.18%
1M
0.57%
6M
3.67%
YTD
4.05%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.80%

QQQY

1D
0.50%
1M
-3.16%
6M
11.25%
YTD
12.11%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.79M$2.09M$2.92M
$45.79K$155.61K$109.70K

XIDE vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XIDE and QQQY is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2023

0.72

The correlation between XIDE and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIDE vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XIDE
XIDE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XIDE vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIDEQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.21

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

1.72

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.74

6.07

+11.67

XIDE vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIDE and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIDE vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIDE drawdown since its inception was -6.61%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDE and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIDEQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-19.05%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-11.14%

+8.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.19%

+6.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-2.96%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

3.15%

-2.76%

Volatility

XIDE vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) is 0.56%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that XIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIDEQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

6.53%

-5.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

15.23%

-12.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

17.41%

-14.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

15.75%

-10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

15.75%

-10.76%

XIDE vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIDE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIDE vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

XIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than QQQY's 37.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
37.47%45.34%83.34%20.64%
XIDE
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December
5.77%6.51%6.68%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIDE and QQQY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to XIDE (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDE dropped -6.61% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 21.17% vs 7.02% for XIDE. On fees, XIDE is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XIDE has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XIDE is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 37.47%, compared with 5.77% for XIDE.

XIDE is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIDE and 0.99% for QQQY.

XIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIDE and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer