XIDE vs. DOGG
XIDE (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIDE is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XIDE returned 7.39% vs 18.66% for DOGG. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIDE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.
Performance
XIDE vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIDE achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 6.91% return.
XIDE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOGG
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- 18.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XIDE vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XIDE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December | 2.82% | 6.89% | 6.63% | 0.28% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 6.91% | 19.43% | -2.58% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIDE and DOGG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2023 | 0.31 |
XIDE vs. DOGG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIDE
DOGG
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XIDE
DOGG
-
Financial Services
XIDE
DOGG
-
Communication Services
XIDE
DOGG
Consumer Cyclical
XIDE
DOGG
Healthcare
XIDE
DOGG
Industrials
XIDE
DOGG
-
Consumer Defensive
XIDE
DOGG
Energy
XIDE
DOGG
Utilities
XIDE
DOGG
-
Real Estate
XIDE
DOGG
-
Basic Materials
XIDE
DOGG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIDE vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank
XIDE
DOGG
XIDE vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIDE | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.31 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.26 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.26 | 5.27 | +13.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIDE | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 1.79 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.89 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
XIDE vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIDE drawdown since its inception was -6.61%, smaller than the maximum DOGG drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDE and DOGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIDE | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -11.19% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -8.29% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -6.03% | +5.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -3.22% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 3.55% | -3.17% |
Volatility
XIDE vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) is 0.48%, while FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that XIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIDE | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 3.41% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 8.07% | -5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 10.50% | -7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 12.97% | -7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 12.97% | -7.85% |
XIDE vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIDE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIDE vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison
XIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, less than DOGG's 8.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.74% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% |
XIDE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December | 6.38% | 6.51% | 6.68% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIDE and DOGG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOGG has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to XIDE (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDE dropped -6.61% vs DOGG's -11.19%.
On 1-year performance, DOGG leads with 18.66% vs 7.39% for XIDE. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XIDE has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DOGG has performed better with a 18.66% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XIDE.
DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 6.38% for XIDE.
XIDE is categorized as Options Trading, while DOGG is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIDE and 0.75% for DOGG.
XIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIDE and DOGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer