XIDE vs. IXC
XIDE (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIDE is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. XIDE is actively managed, while IXC is passively managed. Over the past year, XIDE returned 6.79% vs 29.02% for IXC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIDE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
XIDE vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIDE achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 23.35% return.
XIDE
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- YTD
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
XIDE vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XIDE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December | 3.71% | 6.89% | 6.63% | 0.17% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 23.35% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIDE and IXC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2023 | 0.13 |
The correlation between XIDE and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIDE vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
XIDE
IXC
XIDE vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIDE | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.26 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.95 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.55 | 6.26 | +11.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIDE vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIDE drawdown since its inception was -6.61%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDE and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIDE | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -67.88% | +61.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -15.36% | +12.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.22% | +11.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -17.45% | +17.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 4.78% | -4.39% |
Volatility
XIDE vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) is 0.67%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that XIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIDE | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 6.59% | -5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 15.86% | -13.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90% | 19.18% | -16.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 23.45% | -18.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 26.81% | -21.77% |
XIDE vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIDE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIDE vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
XIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than IXC's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.08% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
XIDE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December | 6.33% | 6.51% | 6.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIDE and IXC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to XIDE (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDE dropped -6.61% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 1-year performance, IXC leads with 29.02% vs 6.79% for XIDE. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XIDE has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IXC has performed better with a 29.02% return vs 6.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XIDE.
XIDE has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 3.08% for IXC.
XIDE is categorized as Options Trading, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIDE and 0.40% for IXC.
XIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIDE and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer