PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIDE vs. BGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIDE vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIDE achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than BGLD's -1.29% return.


XIDE

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.82%
6M
3.29%
1Y
7.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGLD

1D
-2.05%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
11.33%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIDE vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XIDE
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December
2.82%6.89%6.63%0.28%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
-1.29%33.03%21.80%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XIDE and BGLD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2023

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIDE vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIDE
XIDE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIDE vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XIDEBGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.19

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.02

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.26

3.19

+16.07

XIDE vs. BGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the BGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIDE and BGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XIDEBGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

0.94

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

1.01

+0.32

Drawdowns

XIDE vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIDE drawdown since its inception was -6.61%, smaller than the maximum BGLD drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIDE and BGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIDEBGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-16.19%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-11.11%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-8.70%

+8.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-3.65%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

3.55%

-3.17%

Volatility

XIDE vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December (XIDE) is 0.48%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that XIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIDEBGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

2.74%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

10.22%

-7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

12.09%

-9.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

10.01%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

9.93%

-4.81%

XIDE vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIDE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIDE vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison

XIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, less than BGLD's 44.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
44.90%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%
XIDE
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December
6.38%6.51%6.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIDE and BGLD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGLD has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to XIDE (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIDE dropped -6.61% vs BGLD's -16.19%.

On 1-year performance, BGLD leads with 11.33% vs 7.39% for XIDE. On fees, XIDE is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XIDE has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BGLD has performed better with a 11.33% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XIDE is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.

BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 44.90%, compared with 6.38% for XIDE.

XIDE is categorized as Options Trading, while BGLD is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIDE and 0.91% for BGLD.

XIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIDE and BGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer