PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIC.TO vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIC.TO vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XIC.TO is traded in CAD, while COST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COST values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 16.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XIC.TO has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 12.79%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.32% annualized return.


XIC.TO

1D
0.79%
1M
3.46%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.99%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
23.86%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
12.79%

COST

1D
0.87%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
16.55%
6M
12.97%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
26.99%
5Y*
25.70%
10Y*
23.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIC.TO vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
11.27%31.51%21.48%11.74%-5.82%23.43%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
16.55%-9.71%51.45%45.46%-13.92%51.75%29.52%39.70%19.90%14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XIC.TO and COST is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.26

The correlation between XIC.TO and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIC.TO vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIC.TO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIC.TOCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.02

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

0.05

+3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.02

0.12

+16.90

XIC.TO vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIC.TO and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIC.TO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.27%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -33.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIC.TOCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.27%

-33.74%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-14.89%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-23.58%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-30.01%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

-30.01%

-7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-10.25%

+9.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-7.21%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

6.20%

-4.17%

Volatility

XIC.TO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) is 4.53%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that XIC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIC.TOCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

7.80%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

15.65%

-4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

20.08%

-7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

23.87%

-10.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

23.14%

-8.16%

Dividends

XIC.TO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.01%2.23%2.64%2.96%3.10%2.45%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIC.TO and COST have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIC.TO and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer