PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYF vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYF vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYF achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.34% return.


XHYF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
0.51%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.50%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYF vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XHYF
BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF
-0.10%8.69%8.65%6.54%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.34%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYF and IBIC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

0.16

The correlation between XHYF and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYF vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYF
XHYF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XHYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYF vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYFIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

2.22

-0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

17.09

-15.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

66.52

-59.07

XHYF vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYF Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYF and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYFIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

4.99

-3.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

3.48

-2.75

Drawdowns

XHYF vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYF drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYF and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYFIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-0.90%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-0.26%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.16%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-0.10%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.07%

+0.67%

Volatility

XHYF vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.32%. This indicates that XHYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYFIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.32%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

0.67%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

0.90%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

1.58%

+5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.14%

1.58%

+5.56%

XHYF vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHYF vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

XHYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%
XHYF
BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF
6.27%6.73%7.11%7.00%5.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYF and IBIC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XHYF has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to IBIC (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYF dropped -12.92% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, XHYF leads with 4.79% vs 4.49% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XHYF has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYF.

XHYF has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

XHYF is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XHYF tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Financial & REIT, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYF and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYF and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer