PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XHU.TO (iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF) and KNGC.TO (Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XHU.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD while KNGC.TO tracks the Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XHU.TO returned 13.69% vs 55.50% for KNGC.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHU.TO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for KNGC.TO.

Performance

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHU.TO achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly lower than KNGC.TO's 18.75% return.

XHU.TO

1D
1.05%
1M
2.71%
YTD
13.95%
6M
4.75%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
7.63%

KNGC.TO

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.71%
YTD
18.75%
6M
19.23%
1Y
55.50%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
XHU.TO
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF		13.95%-0.28%4.88%
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF		18.75%41.07%176,983.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XHU.TO and KNGC.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF

Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF

Often compared with XHU.TO:
XHU.TO vs. CUD.TOXHU.TO vs. SCHDXHU.TO vs. VDY.TOXHU.TO vs. XEI.TOXHU.TO vs. XEQT.TOXHU.TO vs. DGROXHU.TO vs. XUS.TO
Often compared with KNGC.TO:
KNGC.TO vs. TULV.TOKNGC.TO vs. DMEC.TOKNGC.TO vs. FXM.TOKNGC.TO vs. TQCD.TOKNGC.TO vs. ETSX.TOKNGC.TO vs. XCSR.TOKNGC.TO vs. FCCM.NEO

Return for Risk

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XHU.TO
XHU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XHU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO
KNGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XHU.TOKNGC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.17
4.54

-3.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.54
6.34

-4.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.92

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

14.41

-12.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

52.56

-47.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the KNGC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHU.TO and KNGC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XHU.TOKNGC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

4.54

-3.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.04

+0.50

Drawdowns

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, which is greater than KNGC.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHU.TO and KNGC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XHU.TOKNGC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.94%

-20.25%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-3.87%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.53%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.53%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.94%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-0.75%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-3.09%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.06%

+1.45%

Volatility

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that XHU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XHU.TOKNGC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

2.31%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

9.01%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

12.30%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.89%

123,156.10%

-123,144.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

123,156.10%

-123,141.72%

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHU.TO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than KNGC.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHU.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than KNGC.TO's 1.62% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNGC.TO
Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF		1.62%1.69%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHU.TO
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF		2.44%2.75%2.72%2.86%2.63%2.60%3.18%2.25%2.52%2.27%2.38%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

XHU.TO and KNGC.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KNGC.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KNGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for XHU.TO.

XHU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while KNGC.TO tracks Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brompton. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XHU.TO and 0.17% for KNGC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHU.TO and KNGC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer