PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHLF vs. XTRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHLF vs. XTRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than XTRE's -0.06% return.


XHLF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.71%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
10Y*

XTRE

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.07%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHLF vs. XTRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
1.39%4.21%5.04%4.90%0.96%
XTRE
BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.06%6.05%3.05%4.44%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XHLF and XTRE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between XHLF and XTRE has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHLF vs. XTRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHLF
XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

XTRE
XTRE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHLF vs. XTRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHLFXTREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+43.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

11.75

1.28

+10.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

98.81

2.14

+96.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

670.31

6.25

+664.06

XHLF vs. XTRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 12.43, which is higher than the XTRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and XTRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHLFXTREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43

1.52

+10.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.75

1.10

+9.65

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. XTRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum XTRE drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and XTRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHLFXTREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-2.89%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-1.53%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.06%

-2.00%

+1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.13%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.52%

-0.51%

Volatility

XHLF vs. XTRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.08%, while BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHLFXTREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

0.63%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.22%

1.49%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32%

2.15%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.42%

3.32%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.42%

3.32%

-2.90%

XHLF vs. XTRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XTRE's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XHLF vs. XTRE - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than XTRE's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.85%3.98%4.96%4.50%0.86%
XTRE
BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.01%3.85%4.19%3.97%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHLF and XTRE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTRE has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to XHLF (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHLF dropped -0.11% vs XTRE's -2.89%.

On 3-year performance, XHLF leads with 4.62% vs 3.89% for XTRE. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XHLF has performed better with a 4.62% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for XTRE.

XTRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 3.85% for XHLF.

XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index, while XTRE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3 Year Target Duration Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XHLF and 0.05% for XTRE.

XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.43 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHLF and XTRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer