XHLF vs. SCHO
XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - XHLF tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index while SCHO tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHLF returned 4.54%/yr vs 4.23%/yr for SCHO. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
XHLF vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.83% return.
XHLF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
SCHO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $59.21M | $61.33M | $83.92M | |
| $12.43M | $15.71M | $17.34M |
XHLF vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 1.99% | 4.21% | 5.04% | 4.90% | 0.89% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.83% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHLF and SCHO is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHLF vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank
XHLF
SCHO
XHLF vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHLF | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +10.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +38.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 10.26 | 1.38 | +8.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 94.58 | 3.13 | +91.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 614.05 | 13.09 | +600.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHLF vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and SCHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHLF | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -5.69% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -0.86% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -0.98% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.61% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.20% | -0.19% |
Volatility
XHLF vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.09%, while Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) has a volatility of 0.33%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHLF | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 0.33% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.22% | 1.03% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31% | 1.32% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.41% | 2.00% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.41% | 1.57% | -1.16% |
XHLF vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XHLF and SCHO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XHLF vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than SCHO's 3.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.88% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 3.98% | 4.96% | 4.50% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHLF and SCHO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHO has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to XHLF (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHLF dropped -0.11% vs SCHO's -5.69%.
On 3-year performance, XHLF leads with 4.54% vs 4.23% for SCHO. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XHLF has performed better with a 4.54% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHLF and SCHO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 3.81% for XHLF.
XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab.
XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.33 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHLF and SCHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer