XHLF vs. IBTL
Compare and contrast key facts about BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL).
XHLF and IBTL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHLF is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2022. IBTL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2021. Both XHLF and IBTL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XHLF vs. IBTL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XHLF vs. IBTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 0.77% | 4.21% | 5.04% | 4.90% | 0.96% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | -0.01% | 7.85% | 0.36% | 3.60% | -1.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than IBTL's -0.01% return.
XHLF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTL
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 2.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHLF vs. IBTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTL's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XHLF vs. IBTL — Risk / Return Rank
XHLF
IBTL
XHLF vs. IBTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHLF | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 12.10 | 1.03 | +11.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 39.79 | 1.54 | +38.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 9.68 | 1.19 | +8.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 99.49 | 1.85 | +97.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 604.66 | 5.33 | +599.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHLF | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10 | 1.03 | +11.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.73 | -0.20 | +10.93 |
Correlation
The correlation between XHLF and IBTL is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XHLF vs. IBTL - Dividend Comparison
XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, which matches IBTL's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.92% | 3.98% | 4.96% | 4.50% | 0.86% | 0.00% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | 3.93% | 3.93% | 4.07% | 3.04% | 2.36% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
XHLF vs. IBTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum IBTL drawdown of -20.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and IBTL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHLF | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -20.93% | +20.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -2.48% | +2.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.82% | +6.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -11.64% | +11.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.86% | -0.85% |
Volatility
XHLF vs. IBTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.09%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XHLF | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 1.31% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.21% | 2.37% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 4.23% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 7.57% | -7.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 7.57% | -7.15% |