XHLF vs. IBTE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE).

XHLF and IBTE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHLF is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2022. IBTE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. Both XHLF and IBTE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XHLF vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XHLF vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	0.41%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Returns By Period

XHLF

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHLF vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IBTE

iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF

XHLF

BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF

Return for Risk

XHLF vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHLF

XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHLF vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XHLF	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	12.09	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	39.75	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	9.67	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	99.61	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	605.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XHLF	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	10.74	—	—

Dividends

XHLF vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.88%	3.98%	4.96%	4.50%	0.86%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHLF	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XHLF	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33%	0.00%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.42%	0.00%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.42%	0.00%	+0.42%