XHE vs. FHLC
XHE (SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF) and FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XHE tracks the S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index while FHLC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHE returned 6.02%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for FHLC. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FHLC.
Performance
XHE vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHE achieves a -8.91% return, which is significantly lower than FHLC's -1.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XHE has underperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 6.02%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.88% annualized return.
XHE
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -8.91%
- 6M
- -10.99%
- 1Y
- 1.37%
- 3Y*
- -5.83%
- 5Y*
- -8.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
FHLC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
XHE vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | -8.91% | -0.23% | 5.08% | -6.23% | -23.34% | 3.04% | 32.91% | 22.30% | 8.90% | 30.51% |
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | -1.22% | 15.42% | 2.48% | 2.58% | -5.55% | 20.39% | 18.13% | 21.94% | 4.71% | 23.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHE and FHLC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XHE and FHLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XHE vs. FHLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHE
FHLC
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XHE
FHLC
Financial Services
XHE
FHLC
Industrials
XHE
FHLC
Communication Services
XHE
FHLC
-
Basic Materials
XHE
-
FHLC
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHE
-
FHLC
-
Consumer Defensive
XHE
-
FHLC
-
Energy
XHE
-
FHLC
-
Real Estate
XHE
-
FHLC
-
Technology
XHE
-
FHLC
Utilities
XHE
-
FHLC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHE vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank
XHE
FHLC
XHE vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHE | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.22 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 1.72 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 4.27 | -4.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHE vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHE drawdown since its inception was -49.92%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHE and FHLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHE | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.92% | -28.76% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -10.38% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.62% | -16.87% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.92% | -17.73% | -32.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.92% | -28.76% | -21.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.61% | -4.36% | -35.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.34% | -5.19% | -8.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.42% | 4.19% | +4.23% |
Volatility
XHE vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.92%. This indicates that XHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHE | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 4.92% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.50% | 10.46% | +6.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.12% | 14.70% | +7.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 15.02% | +9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 16.85% | +6.15% |
XHE vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHE vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison
XHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FHLC's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% |
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 7.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHE and FHLC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHE has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to FHLC (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHE dropped -49.92% vs FHLC's -28.76%.
On 10-year performance, FHLC leads with 9.88% vs 6.02% for XHE. On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FHLC has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHE.
FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.09% for XHE.
XHE tracks S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index, while FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHE and 0.08% for FHLC.
FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHE and FHLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer