PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHE vs. CNCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHE vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XHE

1D
-0.95%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
-11.59%
6M
-10.52%
1Y
-2.63%
3Y*
-6.57%
5Y*
-8.01%
10Y*
5.72%

CNCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHE vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


XHE vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XHE
CNCR

Healthcare

98.4%
96.6%

Industrials

1.7%

-

Financial Services

1.6%
3.3%

Communication Services

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XHE
98.4%
CNCR
96.6%

Industrials

XHE
1.7%
CNCR

-

Financial Services

XHE
1.6%
CNCR
3.3%

Communication Services

XHE
1.4%
CNCR

-

Basic Materials

XHE

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Cyclical

XHE

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Defensive

XHE

-

CNCR

-

Energy

XHE

-

CNCR

-

Real Estate

XHE

-

CNCR

-

Technology

XHE

-

CNCR

-

Utilities

XHE

-

CNCR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHE vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHE
XHE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
XHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CNCR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHE vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHECNCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

XHE vs. CNCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHECNCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

XHE vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHE drawdown since its inception was -49.92%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHE and CNCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHECNCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.92%

0.00%

-49.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.39%

0.00%

-41.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

0.00%

-13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.00%

Volatility

XHE vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHECNCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

0.00%

+21.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.40%

0.00%

+24.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.93%

0.00%

+22.93%

XHE vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHE vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

XHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNCR
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHE
SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF
0.09%0.08%0.04%0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.09%0.78%0.17%7.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

XHE has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

XHE tracks S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHE and 0.79% for CNCR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHE and CNCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer