XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO
XHD.TO (iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and KNGC.TO (Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XHD.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD while KNGC.TO tracks the Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XHD.TO returned 11.69% vs 55.50% for KNGC.TO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHD.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for KNGC.TO.
Performance
XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHD.TO achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly lower than KNGC.TO's 18.75% return.
XHD.TO
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.22%
KNGC.TO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 55.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XHD.TO iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 11.94% | 3.92% | 1.81% |
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF | 18.75% | 41.07% | 176,983.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHD.TO and KNGC.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XHD.TO
KNGC.TO
XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHD.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHD.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.92 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 14.41 | -12.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.11 | 52.56 | -47.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHD.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 4.54 | -3.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.04 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than KNGC.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHD.TO and KNGC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHD.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -20.25% | -18.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.51% | -3.87% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -0.75% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -3.09% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.06% | +1.23% |
Volatility
XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHD.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that XHD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHD.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 2.31% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 9.01% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 12.30% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.03% | 123,156.10% | -123,143.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 123,156.10% | -123,140.57% |
XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHD.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than KNGC.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHD.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Dividend Comparison
XHD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than KNGC.TO's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF | 1.62% | 1.69% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHD.TO iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.38% | 2.61% | 2.99% | 3.09% | 2.69% | 2.81% | 3.44% | 2.46% | 2.81% | 2.36% | 2.48% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHD.TO and KNGC.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNGC.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XHD.TO.
XHD.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while KNGC.TO tracks Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Brompton. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for XHD.TO and 0.17% for KNGC.TO.
Find the right allocation for XHD.TO and KNGC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer