XHC.TO vs. VDC
XHC.TO (iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHC.TO is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO returned 6.87%/yr vs 8.37%/yr for VDC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHC.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
XHC.TO vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XHC.TO is traded in CAD, while VDC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of 6.87%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.37% annualized return.
XHC.TO
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- 7.72%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
VDC
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 7.10%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 2.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
XHC.TO vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -5.65% | 10.91% | 1.22% | 2.14% | -3.56% | 21.32% | 8.71% | 22.47% | 2.20% | 16.84% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 7.10% | -2.51% | 23.04% | 0.13% | 5.21% | 16.58% | 8.98% | 19.91% | 0.03% | 4.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHC.TO and VDC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.41 |
XHC.TO vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHC.TO
VDC
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XHC.TO
VDC
Consumer Defensive
XHC.TO
VDC
Basic Materials
XHC.TO
-
VDC
Communication Services
XHC.TO
-
VDC
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHC.TO
-
VDC
Energy
XHC.TO
-
VDC
-
Financial Services
XHC.TO
-
VDC
-
Industrials
XHC.TO
-
VDC
Real Estate
XHC.TO
-
VDC
-
Technology
XHC.TO
-
VDC
-
Utilities
XHC.TO
-
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHC.TO vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
XHC.TO
VDC
XHC.TO vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHC.TO | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.04 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.29 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | 0.62 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHC.TO | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.20 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.74 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.96 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
XHC.TO vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -18.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHC.TO | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -18.30% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -8.74% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -9.94% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.81% | -12.59% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.28% | -18.30% | -8.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -6.78% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -3.08% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 4.17% | +0.22% |
Volatility
XHC.TO vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.37%. This indicates that XHC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHC.TO | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 4.37% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 10.32% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 12.89% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 12.42% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 14.04% | +1.71% |
XHC.TO vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHC.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHC.TO vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than VDC's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.17% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.98% | 1.87% | 4.42% | 2.38% | 0.84% | 0.79% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.68% | 1.14% | 1.63% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHC.TO and VDC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for XHC.TO.
XHC.TO is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. XHC.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for XHC.TO and 0.09% for VDC.
Find the right allocation for XHC.TO and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer