PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHC.TO vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XHC.TO is traded in CAD, while VDC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of 6.87%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.37% annualized return.


XHC.TO

1D
0.59%
1M
0.77%
YTD
-5.65%
6M
-5.54%
1Y
7.72%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
6.87%

VDC

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
7.10%
6M
3.91%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
8.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-5.65%10.91%1.22%2.14%-3.56%21.32%8.71%22.47%2.20%16.84%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
7.10%-2.51%23.04%0.13%5.21%16.58%8.98%19.91%0.03%4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XHC.TO and VDC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.41

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XHC.TO
VDC

Healthcare

97.4%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
97.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.8%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XHC.TO
97.4%
VDC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

XHC.TO
0.5%
VDC
97.5%

Basic Materials

XHC.TO

-

VDC
0.3%

Communication Services

XHC.TO

-

VDC

-

Consumer Cyclical

XHC.TO

-

VDC
1.8%

Energy

XHC.TO

-

VDC

-

Financial Services

XHC.TO

-

VDC

-

Industrials

XHC.TO

-

VDC
0.3%

Real Estate

XHC.TO

-

VDC

-

Technology

XHC.TO

-

VDC

-

Utilities

XHC.TO

-

VDC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHC.TO vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHC.TO
XHC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHC.TOVDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.04

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

0.29

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

0.62

+1.14

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHC.TO and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHC.TOVDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.20

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.74

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.60

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.96

-0.29

Drawdowns

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -18.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHC.TOVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.28%

-18.30%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-8.74%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-9.94%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-12.59%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-18.30%

-8.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

-6.78%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-3.08%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

4.17%

+0.22%

Volatility

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.37%. This indicates that XHC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHC.TOVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.37%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

10.32%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

12.89%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

12.42%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

14.04%

+1.71%

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHC.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHC.TO vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than VDC's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.98%1.87%4.42%2.38%0.84%0.79%0.96%1.07%1.68%1.14%1.63%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHC.TO and VDC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for XHC.TO.

XHC.TO is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. XHC.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for XHC.TO and 0.09% for VDC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHC.TO and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer