PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XHC.TO vs. LIFE.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XHC.TOLIFE.TO
YTD Return10.11%5.73%
1Y Return17.70%13.98%
3Y Return (Ann)2.96%4.01%
5Y Return (Ann)8.10%8.63%
Sharpe Ratio1.641.29
Sortino Ratio2.331.84
Omega Ratio1.291.22
Calmar Ratio1.421.46
Martin Ratio6.444.93
Ulcer Index2.46%2.47%
Daily Std Dev9.62%9.43%
Max Drawdown-27.28%-20.04%
Current Drawdown-6.18%-7.56%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between XHC.TO and LIFE.TO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

XHC.TO vs. LIFE.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than LIFE.TO's 5.73% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.06%
-2.14%
XHC.TO
LIFE.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XHC.TO vs. LIFE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
Expense ratio chart for XHC.TO: current value at 0.66% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.66%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XHC.TO vs. LIFE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund (LIFE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHC.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XHC.TO, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XHC.TO, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.88
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XHC.TO, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XHC.TO, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XHC.TO, currently valued at 4.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.54
LIFE.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LIFE.TO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LIFE.TO, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LIFE.TO, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LIFE.TO, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LIFE.TO, currently valued at 3.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.45

XHC.TO vs. LIFE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the LIFE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHC.TO and LIFE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.80JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.30
1.00
XHC.TO
LIFE.TO

Dividends

XHC.TO vs. LIFE.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than LIFE.TO's 6.09% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
2.20%2.38%0.84%0.79%0.93%1.03%1.63%1.10%1.58%2.07%1.00%1.21%
LIFE.TO
Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund
6.09%9.24%8.20%6.46%7.09%2,839,567.87%6,633,719.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XHC.TO vs. LIFE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, which is greater than LIFE.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and LIFE.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.99%
-10.33%
XHC.TO
LIFE.TO

Volatility

XHC.TO vs. LIFE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) is 3.04%, while Evolve Global Healthcare Enhanced Yield Fund (LIFE.TO) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that XHC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIFE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.04%
3.47%
XHC.TO
LIFE.TO