PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XHC.TO (iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while FTS.TO (Fortis Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO returned 6.87%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for FTS.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than FTS.TO's 8.30% return. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO has underperformed FTS.TO with an annualized return of 6.87%, while FTS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.

XHC.TO

1D
0.59%
1M
0.77%
YTD
-5.65%
6M
-5.54%
1Y
7.72%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
6.87%

FTS.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
8.30%
6M
8.41%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		-5.65%10.91%1.22%2.14%-3.56%21.32%8.71%22.47%2.20%16.84%
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.		8.30%23.93%14.24%4.76%-7.87%21.81%0.04%22.71%2.74%15.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XHC.TO and FTS.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Fortis Inc.

Often compared with XHC.TO:
XHC.TO vs. XLVXHC.TO vs. VHTXHC.TO vs. TDOCXHC.TO vs. LIFE.TOXHC.TO vs. XST.TOXHC.TO vs. IHIXHC.TO vs. ZUH.TO
Often compared with FTS.TO:
FTS.TO vs. CU.TOFTS.TO vs. EMA.TOFTS.TO vs. T.TOFTS.TO vs. H.TOFTS.TO vs. VDY.TOFTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TOFTS.TO vs. TRP.TO

Return for Risk

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XHC.TO
XHC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
FTS.TO
FTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XHC.TOFTS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.54
1.43

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.91
2.11

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

3.04

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

7.25

-5.49

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHC.TO and FTS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XHC.TOFTS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.43

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.75

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.65

+0.03

Drawdowns

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, smaller than the maximum FTS.TO drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and FTS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XHC.TOFTS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.28%

-35.48%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-6.09%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-11.22%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-24.01%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-28.27%

+0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

-4.32%

-5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-6.52%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

2.63%

+1.76%

Volatility

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) have volatilities of 4.76% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XHC.TOFTS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.84%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

10.39%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

12.93%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

14.41%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

16.84%

-1.09%

Dividends

XHC.TO vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than FTS.TO's 3.34% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.		3.34%3.48%3.99%4.19%4.01%3.36%3.73%3.39%3.79%3.52%3.68%3.73%
XHC.TO
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.98%1.87%4.42%2.38%0.84%0.79%0.96%1.07%1.68%1.14%1.63%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

XHC.TO and FTS.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHC.TO and FTS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer