XHC.TO vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
XHC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 12, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XHC.TO or ^GSPC.
Key characteristics
| XHC.TO | ^GSPC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.29% | 25.45% |
| 1Y Return | 14.74% | 35.64% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.26% | 8.55% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.71% | 14.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.55% | 11.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.64 | 2.90 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.34 | 3.87 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.54 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.51 | 4.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.17 | 18.72 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.54% | 1.90% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.57% | 12.27% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.28% | -56.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.73% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHC.TO and ^GSPC is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XHC.TO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 25.45% return. Over the past 10 years, XHC.TO has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.55%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XHC.TO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
XHC.TO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XHC.TO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) is 3.10%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that XHC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.