PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHB vs. SIMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHB vs. SIMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHB achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than SIMS's 13.06% return.


XHB

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.46%
YTD
1.06%
6M
-4.89%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
12.71%

SIMS

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.83%
YTD
13.06%
6M
9.06%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHB vs. SIMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHB
SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF
1.06%-0.69%9.87%60.10%-28.93%49.70%27.97%41.30%-25.73%-0.27%
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
13.06%23.75%-0.27%7.43%-27.13%9.00%29.88%35.30%-18.07%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XHB and SIMS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.71

The correlation between XHB and SIMS shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XHB vs. SIMS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XHB
SIMS

Consumer Cyclical

60.8%
3.4%

Industrials

38.1%
51.4%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.3%

Communication Services

-

5.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

11.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

22.2%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XHB
60.8%
SIMS
3.4%

Industrials

XHB
38.1%
SIMS
51.4%

Real Estate

XHB
1.1%
SIMS

-

Basic Materials

XHB

-

SIMS
3.3%

Communication Services

XHB

-

SIMS
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

XHB

-

SIMS

-

Energy

XHB

-

SIMS
11.0%

Financial Services

XHB

-

SIMS

-

Healthcare

XHB

-

SIMS

-

Technology

XHB

-

SIMS
22.2%

Utilities

XHB

-

SIMS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHB vs. SIMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHB
XHB Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHB Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHB Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SIMS
SIMS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHB vs. SIMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) and SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHBSIMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.30

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.54

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.01

6.65

-5.63

XHB vs. SIMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHB Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the SIMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHB and SIMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHBSIMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.74

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.03

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.25

-0.09

Drawdowns

XHB vs. SIMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHB drawdown since its inception was -81.61%, which is greater than SIMS's maximum drawdown of -43.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHB and SIMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHBSIMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.61%

-43.97%

-37.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.71%

-15.79%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.53%

-28.78%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.46%

-43.97%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.32%

-0.74%

-15.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.60%

-16.09%

-11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.29%

6.03%

+4.26%

Volatility

XHB vs. SIMS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) at 5.15%. This indicates that XHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHBSIMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

5.15%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

14.95%

+5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.75%

23.26%

+4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.64%

25.08%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

26.02%

+1.40%

XHB vs. SIMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SIMS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHB vs. SIMS - Dividend Comparison

XHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than SIMS's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
0.57%0.66%0.88%1.49%1.48%0.97%0.58%1.24%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHB
SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF
0.62%0.78%0.59%0.77%1.06%0.51%0.73%0.89%1.25%0.72%0.67%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHB and SIMS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XHB has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to SIMS (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHB dropped -81.61% vs SIMS's -43.97%.

On 5-year performance, XHB leads with 8.00% vs 0.71% for SIMS. On fees, XHB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SIMS has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XHB has performed better with a 8.00% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SIMS.

XHB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.57% for SIMS.

XHB is categorized as Building & Construction, while SIMS is Global Equities. XHB tracks S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, while SIMS tracks S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHB and 0.45% for SIMS.

SIMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHB and SIMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer